O
Imperial County, California
← Community
ZoningCommunity discussion

CEQA update (Item 14)

Imperial County, California

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (2)Opposed (3)Neutral (1)

At a glance

Public comments
6
Last 30 days
0

Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Sep 22, 2026.

Public comments (6)

SupportivePeter RodriguezSep 22, 2026

Encouraged the Board to reach consensus and approve the improved CEQA update, crediting staff for listening to the public.

Board of Supervisors - Sep 22, 2026 · 53:52 →
OpposedJake TysonSep 22, 2026

Submitted written objections and urged a no vote, arguing the procedures restrict public participation and invite lawsuits.

Board of Supervisors - Sep 22, 2026 · 50:37 →
SupportiveEric Montoya ReyesSep 22, 2026

Supported moving forward, saying the county has heard the community and shouldn't be paralyzed by ballot-box threats.

Board of Supervisors - Sep 22, 2026 · 2:16:45 →
NeutralSusan ParadiseSep 22, 2026

Asked the Board to take two more weeks to review the full document before voting.

Board of Supervisors - Sep 22, 2026 · 47:33 →
OpposedIda BurtonSep 22, 2026

Argued the county has been hostile to CEQA and urged stronger environmental protection so people want to live in the valley.

Board of Supervisors - Sep 22, 2026 · 2:20:59 →
OpposedJacob RodriguezSep 22, 2026

Asked the Board to codify who decides bifurcated approvals and urged a no vote or referral, saying the process is hard for ordinary residents.

Board of Supervisors - Sep 22, 2026 · 2:24:20 →