Data center letter ratification (Item 19)
Imperial County, California
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 6
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Feb 17, 2026.
Public comments (6)
Criticized the county's letter to Senator Padilla, saying the data center project bypassed CEQA, that the developer lacks experience and credibility, and urged the Board to move the item from consent to action and start a real dialogue.
Board of Supervisors - Special Meeting - Feb 17, 2026 · 6:29 →Asked the Board to address Senator Padilla's concerns in the letter, put a data center item on a future agenda for open comment, and make their position on the project known — saying silence looks like enabling it.
Board of Supervisors - Special Meeting - Feb 17, 2026 · 15:35 →Drawing on his air pollution control board service, said the issue is a failure to communicate and suggested adding CEO communications to the timeline privately as an olive branch.
Board of Supervisors - Special Meeting - Feb 17, 2026 · 18:40 →Respectfully asked that item 19 be pulled from consent and made an action item so the public can comment, saying she stayed up until 1 a.m. wondering if her business will survive.
Board of Supervisors - Special Meeting - Feb 17, 2026 · 20:51 →Challenged the letter's claim that the county didn't solicit the data center project, citing Tim Kelly's earlier statements at the podium and questioning where the RFP was; a heated exchange with Supervisor Kelley followed.
Board of Supervisors - Special Meeting - Feb 17, 2026 · 22:59 →Said ratifying the letter sends a clear message to residents and asked the Board simply to align with the county's own adopted health and safety standards; urged them not to ratify.
Board of Supervisors - Special Meeting - Feb 17, 2026 · 26:28 →