Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Supportive (1)Opposed (3)
At a glance
- Public comments
- 4
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jan 27, 2026.
Public comments (4)
OpposedDiana RubinJan 27, 2026
Property owner near the proposed tower site opposed it, citing property value drops, health concerns, beacon lights, nearby school, and crop duster and helicopter traffic.
Board of Supervisors - Jan 27, 2026 · 2:24:19 →OpposedMichael PotterJan 27, 2026
Nearby resident opposed the tower, citing existing coverage, crop duster and military helicopter flight paths, strobe lights, and lack of transparency about the lease.
Board of Supervisors - Jan 27, 2026 · 2:28:56 →SupportiveTimothy KellyJan 27, 2026
Supported the tower on behalf of the broadband consortium, citing coverage gaps, the homework gap, and improved cell service needs in underserved areas.
Board of Supervisors - Jan 27, 2026 · 2:35:59 →OpposedAdrian MartinezJan 27, 2026
Nearby resident cited a Swedish study on 5G tower health effects and asked the Board to reconsider the project.
Board of Supervisors - Jan 27, 2026 · 2:40:29 →